Difference between revisions of "PhDSupervision:Dhananjay Ipparthi"
From IridiaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 58: | Line 58: | ||
** Synopsis: An in-depth review of macroscale parallel self-assembling systems. Summaries, categorisations and differentiations of the various works till date. Provide open problems. |
** Synopsis: An in-depth review of macroscale parallel self-assembling systems. Summaries, categorisations and differentiations of the various works till date. Provide open problems. |
||
** Project page: [[Parallel self-assembling systems review paper]] |
** Project page: [[Parallel self-assembling systems review paper]] |
||
− | |||
− | == Published papers == |
||
− | * Parallel self-assembly using dipole words |
||
− | ** Authors: Dhananjay Ipparthi, Andrew Winslow, Massimo Mastrangeli, and Marco Dorigo. |
||
− | ** Target journal: |
||
− | ** Synopsis: Self-assembly of multiple target structures in parallel. The components form bonds with one another based on magnetic dipole words. |
||
− | ** Project page: [[Dipole words]] |
||
== Academic Activities == |
== Academic Activities == |
Revision as of 10:49, 20 April 2016
Personal Information
Name: Dhananjay Ipparthi
Date of arrival in Brussels: 08th February, 2012
Home address: Rue des Vierges 58, 1000 Bruxelles
Telephone number: +32 483 382 207
Milestones
- Three papers
- Thesis
Project pages
Parallel self-assembling systems review paper
Study of yield predictions of a self-assembling system - extended
Dipole words
Dynamics of self-assembly
Conformational Switching
Papers in progress
- A Study of Yield Predictions for a Model of Homogeneous Self-Assembling Components: extended version
- Authors: Dhananjay Ipparthi, Andrew Winslow, Massimo Mastrangeli, and Marco Dorigo.
- Target journal: Artificial Life and Robotics Special Issue
- Synopsis: Statistics to compare model and physical experiments. A closed form model for the formation of incompatible substructures??
- Project page: Theory of incompatible substructure problem
- Experiments to validate incompatible substructures model and growth of incompatible substructures
- Authors: Dhananjay Ipparthi, Nicolas Cambier, Andrew Winslow, Massimo Mastrangeli and Marco Dorigo
- Target journal:
- Synopsis: Study of how the incompatible substructures are formed, how the grow and a summary of possible ways to eliminate the problem.
- Project page: Dynamics of self-assembly
- Dynamics of a macro-scale self-assembling system
- Authors: Dhananjay Ipparthi, Nicolas Cambier, Massimo Mastrangeli and Marco Dorigo
- Target conference:
- Synopsis: Impact of different modes of shaking on a self-assembling system: orbitatl, linear, orbital + linear with kicks (random)
- Project page: Dynamics of self-assembly
- Aperiodic breaking up of substructures
- Authors: Dhananjay Ipparthi, Massimo Mastrangeli and Marco Dorigo
- Target conference:
- Synopsis: Study of how high inertia objects can be used to reduce the formation of incompatible substructures.
- Project page: Use of a external agent to break incompatible substructures
- Conformational switching
- Authors: Dhananjay Ipparthi, Massimo Mastrangeli and Marco Dorigo
- Target journal: Artificial Life
- Synopsis: Presentation of a purely mechanical conformational switching mechanism used for self-assembly.
- Project page: Conformational Switching
- Review of macroscale parallel self-assembling systems
- Authors: Dhananjay Ipparthi, Marco Dorigo and Massimo Mastrangeli.
- Target journal: Micromachines: Special Issue on Building by Self-Assembly
- Synopsis: An in-depth review of macroscale parallel self-assembling systems. Summaries, categorisations and differentiations of the various works till date. Provide open problems.
- Project page: Parallel self-assembling systems review paper
Academic Activities
8th February - 16th February, 2016
- Presented my work to the "Programmable self-assembly subgroup" on the 11th of February. Metin attended that presentation. The group expressed interest in one of the results presented in "A geometrical approach to the incompatible substructure problem in parallel self-assembly". The wanted to know why the 90 deg component experiments resulted in a high yield. I told the group that we suspect that symmetry and the high probability of forming pairs could be the reason for the high yield. I added that we would be studying this phenomenon in detail using video tracking in our upcoming work on the extended yield prediction paper. The group also had some input for the issues I have with regard to the conformational switching work.
- Increased the shielding of conformational switching components. The increased shielding seems to reduce the local effects of magnets in the vicinity.
- Finished designing the jig that we will use to create "random kicks" during orbital shaking. I will be meeting the in-house production engineer this afternoon before getting it fabricated.
- The shaker has not yet arrived. The secretary here (Janina) says we would have to wait for a few more weeks.