Difference between revisions of "Table of contents"
From IridiaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (Blanked the page) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | == Table of content of thesis == |
||
| − | === Introduction === |
||
| − | === Background === |
||
| − | * The literature review section of my rapport d'avancement covers about 60% of work that I will cover in my doctoral thesis |
||
| − | === Theoretical treatment of incompatible substructure problem === |
||
| − | * SWARM2015 conference paper presents initial findings of yield predictions [published] |
||
| − | * Extended yield predictions journal paper [not yet published] |
||
| − | === Approaches to solve the incompatible substructure problem === |
||
| − | ===== Self-assembly ===== |
||
| − | * TODO: Tune the magnetism of the components such that the fully formed target structures are stable, but substructures are susceptible to breakage |
||
| − | ===== Changing geometry ===== |
||
| − | * [Published: PPSN] |
||
| − | ===== Conformational switching ===== |
||
| − | * TODO: Close to final design of components |
||
| − | ===== Use of high inertia components ===== |
||
| − | * Successfully conducted preliminary experiments |
||
| − | * TODO: Define experiment and collect data |
||
| − | * Massimo suggested, and I agree, that I write an "approaches to the yield predictions" paper. In that paper, I would include the aforementioned approaches. [not yet published] |
||
| − | ===== Dipole codes ===== |
||
| − | * [Published: Theoretical Computer Science] |
||
| − | === Dynamics of aggregating / self-assembling systems === |
||
| − | * Nicolas has developed visual tracking system and used it to find: |
||
| − | ** Time evolution of aggregation |
||
| − | ** Distance distribution |
||
| − | ** Velocity distribution |
||
| − | * Collaboration with Korean Institute of Science and Technology [Leon Abelmann, Tijmen Hageman, etc.] |
||
| − | ** Found the different energy regimes for our aggregating system |
||
| − | ** Established that outside the ballistic regime, the components perform "random walk" |
||
| − | *** The data neatly fits into a Rayleigh distribution |
||
| − | * TODO: Get new camera, re-analyse data |
||
| − | * TODO: Write a "methodology" style paper |
||
| − | === Conclusions === |
||
| − | * Contribution 1: Theoretical analysis of parallel assembly vis-a-vis the incompatible substructure problem |
||
| − | * Contribution 2: 5 approaches to avoid the incompatible substructure problem |
||
| − | * Contribution 3: Study of the dynamics of aggregation / parallel assembly |
||
