Difference between revisions of "Comparison"
From IridiaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 8: | Line 8: | ||
|| Number of used opinions for voting strategy || Last 2 opinions in robot's memory || Last 2 opinions in robot's blockchain |
|| Number of used opinions for voting strategy || Last 2 opinions in robot's memory || Last 2 opinions in robot's blockchain |
||
|- |
|- |
||
− | || Dissemination State || Time proportional to sensor readings (sample from an exponential distribution with |
+ | || Dissemination State || Time proportional to sensor readings ^p (sample from an exponential distribution with pg, g = 10, and ) || Use one of the strategies described below |
|- |
|- |
||
− | || Exploration State|| Sample from an exponential distribution || Disconnect from peers |
+ | || Exploration State|| Sample from an exponential distribution (sample from an exponential distribution with σ = 10)|| Disconnect from peers |
|} |
|} |
||
Revision as of 13:51, 30 January 2017
Problem
"How to transfer the sensors readings (quality of the opinion) into a secure dissemination strategy that is similar to the existing approach?"
Comparison
Feature | Classical approach | Blockchain approach |
---|---|---|
Number of used opinions for voting strategy | Last 2 opinions in robot's memory | Last 2 opinions in robot's blockchain |
Dissemination State | Time proportional to sensor readings ^p (sample from an exponential distribution with pg, g = 10, and ) | Use one of the strategies described below |
Exploration State | Sample from an exponential distribution (sample from an exponential distribution with σ = 10) | Disconnect from peers |
Strategies
Strategy 1: Amount of transactions
- Send a transaction with 1 ether in each timestep of the dissemination state
- Expected behavior:
Strategy 2: Direct modulation
- Send one transaction each time a robot enters the dissemination state, include amount of ether that is proportional to the quality of the opinion
- Expected behavior:
Strategy 3: Mining time
- Make mining time proportional to the quality of the opinion
- Expected behavior:
Strategy 4: Hash-puzzle
- Robots have to solve a (hash-based) puzzle, whose difficulty is proportional to the quality of the opinion they want to send
- Expected behavior:
Strategy 5: Most similar
- Only connect to neighbors in the dissemination state
- The longer a robot is in the state, the more other robots will receive its opinion
- Problem: When do robots mine? Only in the last x seconds (fixed)? Or for a time proportional to their opinion?
- Expected behavior:
Alternative
- Use an alternative approach that is not similar to Gabri's approach
- Expected behavior:
- Advantages: Can tailor approach to the blockchain
- Disadvantages: Might be harder to compare the approach and show its advantages