Difference between revisions of "Theory of incompatible substructure problem"
From IridiaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
=== Particulars of experiments (10 trials each) === |
=== Particulars of experiments (10 trials each) === |
||
* Photos of initial condition and final condition |
* Photos of initial condition and final condition |
||
| − | * Assembly of one target structure |
+ | * Assembly of one target structure |
| − | * |
+ | ** Data to be collected: number of targets and number of incompatible substructures, time for steady state |
| − | * Assembly of |
+ | * Assembly of two target structures |
| − | * |
+ | ** Data to be collected: number of targets and number of incompatible substructures, time for steady state |
| − | * Assembly of |
+ | * Assembly of three target structures |
| + | ** Data to be collected: number of targets and number of incompatible substructures, time for steady state |
||
| + | * Assembly of four target structures |
||
| + | ** Data to be collected: number of targets and number of incompatible substructures, time for steady state |
||
| + | * Assembly of five target structures |
||
| + | ** Data to be collected: number of targets and number of incompatible substructures, time for steady state |
||
* Results to show |
* Results to show |
||
| + | ** The simulated probability of the formation of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 target structures in self-assembly experiments |
||
| − | ** Result 1 |
||
| + | ** Comparison of simulated probability vs. probability achieved in physical experiments |
||
| − | ** Result 2 |
||
| + | ** Reasons for similarities and/or differences between simulated probability vs. probability of physical experiments |
||
| − | ** Result 3 |
||
| − | ** Result 4 |
||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Meeting minutes == |
== Meeting minutes == |
||
Revision as of 16:37, 25 November 2014
Schedule
- 19th December, 2014 : Submit final draft of incompatible substructure paper to Marco
- 30th November, 2014 : Finish results, create plots
Todo
Parameters
- Components
- Radius of each component: 25 mm
- Thickness of each component: 8 mm
- Radius of magnet: 1.5 mm
- Strength of magnet: N48
- Polyamide
- Container
- Radius of container: 125 mm
- Depth of container: 9 mm
- Material: Acrylic
- Shaker
- Mode: Orbital shaking
- Speed: 300 rpm
- Duration for shaking: until stable structures are formed
Experiments
- Assembly of 1 target structure
- Assembly of 2 target structures
- Assembly of 3 target structures
- Assembly of 4 target structures
- Assembly of 5 target structures
Particulars of experiments (10 trials each)
- Photos of initial condition and final condition
- Assembly of one target structure
- Data to be collected: number of targets and number of incompatible substructures, time for steady state
- Assembly of two target structures
- Data to be collected: number of targets and number of incompatible substructures, time for steady state
- Assembly of three target structures
- Data to be collected: number of targets and number of incompatible substructures, time for steady state
- Assembly of four target structures
- Data to be collected: number of targets and number of incompatible substructures, time for steady state
- Assembly of five target structures
- Data to be collected: number of targets and number of incompatible substructures, time for steady state
- Results to show
- The simulated probability of the formation of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 target structures in self-assembly experiments
- Comparison of simulated probability vs. probability achieved in physical experiments
- Reasons for similarities and/or differences between simulated probability vs. probability of physical experiments
