Difference between revisions of "PhDSupervision:Dhananjay Ipparthi/Table of contents"
From IridiaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* Extended yield predictions journal paper [not yet published. submission deadline: 5th June, 2016] |
* Extended yield predictions journal paper [not yet published. submission deadline: 5th June, 2016] |
||
=== Dynamics of aggregating / self-assembling systems === |
=== Dynamics of aggregating / self-assembling systems === |
||
| + | * Two geometries |
||
| + | * Two modes of shaking |
||
* Nicolas has developed visual tracking system and used it to find: |
* Nicolas has developed visual tracking system and used it to find: |
||
** Time evolution of aggregation |
** Time evolution of aggregation |
||
| Line 17: | Line 19: | ||
* TODO: Get new camera, re-analyse data |
* TODO: Get new camera, re-analyse data |
||
* TODO: Write a "methodology" style paper [submission deadline:?] |
* TODO: Write a "methodology" style paper [submission deadline:?] |
||
| + | |||
=== Approaches to solve the incompatible substructure problem === |
=== Approaches to solve the incompatible substructure problem === |
||
===== Compartmentalisation ===== |
===== Compartmentalisation ===== |
||
| Line 33: | Line 36: | ||
* Massimo suggested, and I agree, that I write an "approaches to the yield predictions" paper. In that paper, I would include the aforementioned approaches. [submission deadline: ??] |
* Massimo suggested, and I agree, that I write an "approaches to the yield predictions" paper. In that paper, I would include the aforementioned approaches. [submission deadline: ??] |
||
| − | + | ===== Comparison of the different approaches. Perhaps time and/or yield comparisons? ===== |
|
| − | |||
=== Conclusions === |
=== Conclusions === |
||
Latest revision as of 09:25, 30 May 2016
Table of content of thesis
Introduction
Background
- The literature review section of my rapport d'avancement covers about 60% of work that I will cover in my doctoral thesis
Theoretical treatment of incompatible substructure problem
- SWARM2015 conference paper presents initial findings of yield predictions [published]
- Extended yield predictions journal paper [not yet published. submission deadline: 5th June, 2016]
Dynamics of aggregating / self-assembling systems
- Two geometries
- Two modes of shaking
- Nicolas has developed visual tracking system and used it to find:
- Time evolution of aggregation
- Distance distribution
- Velocity distribution
- Collaboration with Korean Institute of Science and Technology [Leon Abelmann, Tijmen Hageman, etc.]
- Found the different energy regimes for our aggregating system
- Established that outside the ballistic regime, the components perform "random walk"
- The data neatly fits into a Rayleigh distribution
- TODO: Get new camera, re-analyse data
- TODO: Write a "methodology" style paper [submission deadline:?]
Approaches to solve the incompatible substructure problem
Compartmentalisation
- To publish in approaches paper
Self-assembly
- TODO: Tune the magnetism of the components such that the fully formed target structures are stable, but substructures are susceptible to breakage
Changing geometry
- [Published: PPSN]
Conformational switching
- TODO: Close to final design of components
Use of high inertia components
- Successfully conducted preliminary experiments
- TODO: Define experiment and collect data
Dipole codes
- [Published: Theoretical Computer Science]
- Massimo suggested, and I agree, that I write an "approaches to the yield predictions" paper. In that paper, I would include the aforementioned approaches. [submission deadline: ??]
Comparison of the different approaches. Perhaps time and/or yield comparisons?
Conclusions
- Contribution 1: Theoretical analysis of parallel assembly vis-a-vis the incompatible substructure problem
- Contribution 2: 5 approaches to avoid the incompatible substructure problem
- Contribution 3: Study of the dynamics of aggregation / parallel assembly
