Difference between revisions of "Table of contents"
From IridiaWiki
Jump to navigationJump to searchLine 8: | Line 8: | ||
=== Approaches to solve the incompatible substructure problem === |
=== Approaches to solve the incompatible substructure problem === |
||
===== Self-assembly ===== |
===== Self-assembly ===== |
||
+ | * TODO: Tune the magnetism of the components such that the fully formed target structures are stable, but substructures are susceptible to breakage |
||
===== Changing geometry ===== |
===== Changing geometry ===== |
||
* [Published: PPSN] |
* [Published: PPSN] |
||
===== Conformational switching ===== |
===== Conformational switching ===== |
||
− | * Close to final design of components |
+ | * TODO: Close to final design of components |
===== Use of high inertia components ===== |
===== Use of high inertia components ===== |
||
* Successfully conducted preliminary experiments |
* Successfully conducted preliminary experiments |
||
* TODO: Define experiment and collect data |
* TODO: Define experiment and collect data |
||
* Massimo suggested, and I agree, that I write an "approaches to the yield predictions" paper. In that paper, I would include the aforementioned approaches. [not yet published] |
* Massimo suggested, and I agree, that I write an "approaches to the yield predictions" paper. In that paper, I would include the aforementioned approaches. [not yet published] |
||
+ | ===== Dipole codes ===== |
||
+ | * Theoretical work [published] |
||
=== Dynamics of aggregating / self-assembling systems === |
=== Dynamics of aggregating / self-assembling systems === |
||
* Nicolas has developed visual tracking system and used it to find: |
* Nicolas has developed visual tracking system and used it to find: |
||
Line 25: | Line 28: | ||
** Established that outside the ballistic regime, the components perform "random walk" |
** Established that outside the ballistic regime, the components perform "random walk" |
||
*** The data neatly fits into a Rayleigh distribution |
*** The data neatly fits into a Rayleigh distribution |
||
+ | * TODO: Get new camera, re-analyse data |
||
+ | * TODO: Write paper |
||
=== Conclusions === |
=== Conclusions === |
||
+ | * Contribution 1: |
Revision as of 12:26, 17 May 2016
Table of content of thesis
Introduction
Background
- The literature review section of my rapport d'avancement covers about 60% of work that I will cover in my doctoral thesis
Theoretical treatment of incompatible substructure problem
- SWARM2015 conference paper presents initial findings of yield predictions [published]
- Extended yield predictions journal paper [not yet published]
Approaches to solve the incompatible substructure problem
Self-assembly
- TODO: Tune the magnetism of the components such that the fully formed target structures are stable, but substructures are susceptible to breakage
Changing geometry
- [Published: PPSN]
Conformational switching
- TODO: Close to final design of components
Use of high inertia components
- Successfully conducted preliminary experiments
- TODO: Define experiment and collect data
- Massimo suggested, and I agree, that I write an "approaches to the yield predictions" paper. In that paper, I would include the aforementioned approaches. [not yet published]
Dipole codes
- Theoretical work [published]
Dynamics of aggregating / self-assembling systems
- Nicolas has developed visual tracking system and used it to find:
- Time evolution of aggregation
- Distance distribution
- Velocity distribution
- Collaboration with Korean Institute of Science and Technology [Leon Abelmann, Tijmen Hageman, etc.]
- Found the different energy regimes for our aggregating system
- Established that outside the ballistic regime, the components perform "random walk"
- The data neatly fits into a Rayleigh distribution
- TODO: Get new camera, re-analyse data
- TODO: Write paper
Conclusions
- Contribution 1: