SRSP - Revision history

Manubrambi: /* References */

2014-01-10T14:31:41Z

References

Show changes

Manubrambi: /* References */

2014-01-10T14:29:40Z

References

Manubrambi at 14:28, 10 January 2014

2014-01-10T14:28:59Z

Show changes

Manubrambi at 18:09, 9 January 2014

2014-01-09T18:09:57Z

Show changes

Manubrambi at 14:16, 9 January 2014

2014-01-09T14:16:21Z

Manubrambi at 14:16, 9 January 2014

2014-01-09T14:16:02Z

Manubrambi at 14:15, 9 January 2014

2014-01-09T14:15:38Z

Manubrambi at 14:08, 9 January 2014

2014-01-09T14:08:12Z

Show changes

Mdorigo: /* Design */

2013-10-26T11:08:52Z

Design

Mdorigo: /* External Links */

2013-10-26T11:08:06Z

External Links

@@ Line 84: / Line 84: @@
 == References ==
-G. Baldassarre, D. Parisi, and S. Nolfi. Distributed coordination of simulated robots based on self-organization. ''Artificial Life'', 12(3):289â€”311, 2006.
+G. Baldassarre, D. Parisi, and S. Nolfi. Distributed coordination of simulated robots based on self-organization. ''Artificial Life'', 12(3):289â€“311, 2006.
 G. Beni. From swarm intelligence to swarm robotics. In ''Swarm Robotics'', LNCS 3342, pp. 1â€”9, 2005. Springer.

@@ Line 198: / Line 198: @@
 ----
-== Review
+==Review==
 Here are my review comments on the article Swarm Robotics.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:16, 9 January 2014
Line 197:		Line 197:

	----		----
		+
		+	== Review

	Here are my review comments on the article Swarm Robotics.		Here are my review comments on the article Swarm Robotics.

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:15, 9 January 2014
Line 187:		Line 187:
	[[Category:Robotics]]		[[Category:Robotics]]
	[[Category:Computational intelligence]]		[[Category:Computational intelligence]]
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+
		+	----
		+
		+	----
		+
		+	----
		+
		+	Here are my review comments on the article Swarm Robotics.
		+
		+	===1. Overall definition.===
		+
		+	I think this is fine, except for the third sentence.
		+
		+	"The design of robot swarms is guided by swarm intelligence principles, which promote the realization of systems that are fault tolerant, scalable and flexible. "
		+
		+	This doesn't make sense, since swarm intelligence principles are in essence as observed/deduced from biology, whereas the 2nd part of the sentence is about possible engineering benefits. I recommend to split the sentence, i.e.
		+
		+	"The design of robot swarms is guided by swarm intelligence principles. Such principles may lead to engineering benefits including artificial systems that are fault tolerant, scalable and flexible. "
		+
		+	===Answer===
		+	The phrase was restructured as suggested. Note that we kept "promote the realization" as we think that "may lead to" is too weak and does not convey the fact that the swarm intelligence principles are followed to obtain these engineering benefits; "may lead to" seems to convey more the idea that the engineering benefits are just an uncontrolled/unwanted effect.
		+
		+	===2. Characteristics===
		+
		+	Recommend removal of 'large and', so "A robot swarm is a highly redundant group of..." This avoids problems of how robots many is large, etc?
		+
		+	Recommend replacing the work results with 'emerges', in the final sentence of this para.
		+
		+	===Answer===
		+	Reworded as suggested.
		+
		+	===3. Desirable properties===
		+
		+	Recommend replacing 'are deemed to' with 'may' in the first sentence.
		+
		+	Recommend adding the word 'ideally' in 1st sentence of 3rd para, i.e. "...in their group size: ideally the introduction of..."
		+
		+	===Answer===
		+	Regarding the first comment, we kept "are deemed to", for the same reason explained in the answer to 1.
		+
		+	We followed the second comment as suggested.
		+
		+	===4. Potential applications===
		+
		+	Recommend rewording 2nd sentence in 2nd para:
		+
		+	Therefore, a solution that is fault tolerant is necessary, ...
		+	as
		+	Therefore, a fault-tolerant approach is required, ...
		+
		+	===Answer===
		+	Reworded as suggested.
		+
		+	===5. Current Research Axes===
		+
		+	Since you start this section by referring the reader to Brambilla et al, you must ensure that this paper is accessible to all and not behind a paywall, preferably with a link from here, to a pdf.
		+
		+	===Answer===
		+	We rephrased the way the paper is introduced. Unfortunately, we cannot ensure that the paper is open access.
		+
		+	===5.1 Analysis===
		+
		+	Recommend remove 'very' from 2nd line of 2nd para, i.e. "...due to the large number of robots involved"
		+
		+	In the section on Macroscopic models section you might consider adding a reference to
		+	Liu W and Winfield AFT, 'A Macroscopic Probabilistic Model for Collective Foraging with Adaptation', International Journal of Robotics Research, 29 (14), 1743-1760, 2010.
		+	Since this work is one of very few examples of successfully modelling an adaptive swarm.
		+
		+	===Answer===
		+	Done, thanks for the suggested literature.
		+
		+	===5.2 Collective behaviours===
		+
		+	Although you briefly mention human-swarm interaction, I strongly recommend that this merits a section of its own within Current Research Axes. I believe one of the important missing elements in swarm robotics in human-swarm interaction -since even though the indvidual robots may be autonomous the swarm, there still needs to be an effective means for commanding, monitoring and intervening (should things go wrong) with the swarm as a whole, and recommend you highlight the excellent work of both Vaughan et al, and Gambardella et al. I.e.
		+
		+	Shokoofeh Pourmehr and Valiallah Mani Monajjemi and Richard T. Vaughan and Greg Mori. "You two! Take off!": Creating, modifying and commanding groups of robots using face engagement and indirect speech in voice commands Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS'13), Tokyo, Japan 2013
		+
		+	A. Giusti, J. Nagi, L. Gambardella, S. Bonardi, G. A. Di Caro, Human-Swarm Interaction through Distributed Cooperative Gesture Recognition 7th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (Video Session) (HRI), Boston, MA, USA, March 5-8, 2012
		+
		+	===Answer===
		+	We enlarged the part dedicated to human-swarm interaction and added the suggested literature.
		+
		+	===6. Open Issues===
		+
		+	I think this section needs to be strengthened. For instance I think that effective Human Swarm Interaction (HSI) is an impediment to real world application. Others are the lack of any compelling demonstrators for outdoor swarm robotic systems (i.e. waste collection), and the lack of any business case or business model that demonstrates the swarm robotics approach would be more cost effective that any conventional robotics - or none robotics - approaches.
		+
		+	===Answer===
		+	We modified the section as suggested.
		+
		+	===7. References===
		+
		+	Please replace this:
		+	C. Dixon, A. Winfield, and M. Fisher. Towards temporal verification of emergent behaviours in swarm robotic systems. In Towards Autonomous Robotic Systems, LNCS 6856, pp. 336â€“347, 2011. Springer.
		+	With a more recent paper:
		+	Dixon C, Winfield A, Fisher M and Zheng C, Towards Temporal Verification of Swarm Robotic Systems, Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 60 (11), 1429-1441, Nov 2012.
		+
		+	===Answer===
		+	Done, thanks for the suggestion.
		+
		+	===8. Additional General Comments===
		+
		+	i. Someone familiar with conventional multi-robot systems would be puzzled to find no mention here. It would be good to constrast the swarm robotics approach with traditional multi-robot systems (which are sometimes mistakenly called swarm systems).
		+
		+	ii. I'm surprised there is no mention of homogeneity and heterogeneity, i.e. that most existing lab swarm robotics systems are homogeneous, but that the approach does encompass heterogeneous systems. Of course Swarmanoids is a great example.
		+
		+	iii. It may be interesting to include a section on the history of swarm robotics.
		+
		+	iv. the article could be improved by some explanation of the rationale, i.e. the close and symbiotic relationship between the study of social insects/animals and swarm robotics - perhaps this could be included in the Scientific Implications section..?
		+
		+	Note: I was assisted in this review by Dr W Liu.
		+
		+	===Answer===
		+	i. We added a mention of multi-robot systems in Section 1. We think that a formal comparison between swarm robotics and other multi-robot systems would be out of the scope of this article. Our intent is to describe swarm robotics through its characteristics, which are also the characteristics that distinguish swarm robotics from other robotics systems
		+
		+	ii. We added a mention to this in Section 1.
		+
		+	iii. and iv. We added a section on the origins of swarm robotics in which we also presented briefly the historical relationship between biology and swarm robotics.

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:08, 26 October 2013
Line 51:		Line 51:

	In swarm robotics, '''automatic design''' has been mostly performed using the evolutionary robotics approach (Nolfi and Floreano, 2004). Typically, individual robots are controlled by a neural network whose parameters are obtained via artificial evolution (Trianni and Nolfi, 2011). Evolutionary robotics has been used to develop several collective behaviors including collective transport (GroÃŸ and Dorigo, 2008) and development of communication networks (Huaert et al., 2008). One of the main limits of evolutionary robotics is that it is often difficult to define all the elements of the evolutionary process that will produce control software that allows the robot swarm to effectively accomplish the given task.		In swarm robotics, '''automatic design''' has been mostly performed using the evolutionary robotics approach (Nolfi and Floreano, 2004). Typically, individual robots are controlled by a neural network whose parameters are obtained via artificial evolution (Trianni and Nolfi, 2011). Evolutionary robotics has been used to develop several collective behaviors including collective transport (GroÃŸ and Dorigo, 2008) and development of communication networks (Huaert et al., 2008). One of the main limits of evolutionary robotics is that it is often difficult to define all the elements of the evolutionary process that will produce control software that allows the robot swarm to effectively accomplish the given task.
−
−	TODO: remove.
−	An alternative approach to automatically design robot swarms has been recently proposed. In this approach, probabilistic finite state machines are automatically assembled starting from pre-available modular components (Francesca et al., 2014).

	====Analysis====		====Analysis====

@@ Line 165: / Line 165: @@
 * [http://www.springer.com/11721 Swarm Intelligence]:  The main journal in the field.
 * [http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~ants ''ANTS - International Conference on Swarm Intelligence'']: This series of conferences, held for the first time in 1998, is the oldest in the swarm intelligence field.
-* [http://www.computelligence.org/sis/2006/past.php ''IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium'']: Another series of conferences dedicated to swarm intelligence, started in 2013.
+* [http://www.computelligence.org/sis/2006/past.php ''IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium'']: Another series of conferences dedicated to swarm intelligence, started in 2003.
 * [http://www.swarm-bots.org/ Swarm-bots]: research project 2001-2005
 * [http://www.swarms.org/ Swarms]: research project 2003-2007
 * [http://www.i-swarm.org/ i-Swarm project]: research project 2005-2008